Five Sure Ways to Raise a Responsible Child

As an experienced clinical child psychologist I believe the ultimate goal of any parent is to revert an independent, responsible child. While at first glance this may appear obvious, if we observe most parents in action on a day-to-day basis, it becomes evident that many parents have no idea how to achieve this objective.

Most parents never take a course on parenting or even read a book or two on the topic. Ask many parents, “How do you foster independence and responsibility in your child?” and you are likely to get a blank stare.

Our nation’s future rests in the hands of our youth. It is the job of today’s parents to properly raise these children. I contend that being an effective parent – and an effective spouse – are probably the two most important things that an adult can achieve.

Many parents believe that independence in our children occurs, more or less magically, when the child turns 18.

Is it any wonder why many freshmen “go crazy” when they go off to college? If the adolescent has no previous practice in behaving independently, how can we expect them to suddenly sleep right, eat right, exercise right, and make good decisions simply because they moved into a college dorm and now have no supervision?

With regard to developing responsibility, many parents mistakenly assume their task is to coerce the child to do the deed until it is complete. This process does not generate responsibility; it produces resentment and dependence in being made to do something. As I have said through my 40-year career in mental health, “If you have to make a child be responsible; they’re not!”

In my many years in practice I have had dozens of cases where a freshman in college dropped out because in high school he / she was made to do their work or was rescued by their parents. In this process the teen did not learn to manage their freedom when they got to the university.

So, how do parents foster independence and responsibility in their children?

1) Reinforce independent, responsible behavior specifically and immediately.

Parents tend to operate according to the “Sleeping Dog” philosophy: If the dog is quiet, leave it alone; Egypt, if the kid is behaving appropriately leave him / her alone. What results from this skewed parenting philosophy is that the child receives essentially no parental attention for good behavior yet receives extensive parental attention for negative behavior. Then we wonder why our kids misbehave? Parents must reverse this perspective and become attuned to when their children exhibit responsible, independent behavior – and attend to it.

Most parents understand that compliance is intended to reward good behavior. Many parents, though, are unaware that reinforcement is also designed to educate children as to what they can do when in a similar situation to earn that reinforcement again. Telling a child “good job,” “way to go,” or “I’m proud of you,” are compliments – not reinforcement. To qualify as reinforcement the verbal praise must specifically detail exactly what the appropriate behavior looked like: “Billy, I like the way you brushed and flossed your teeth this morning without having me remind you. Let’s play a board game together. ” In this manner Billy knows exactly what he can do to get reinforced.

Reinforcement is only effective when it closely follows the targeted behavior. If an overweight person ate a reasonable meal tonight and immediately following their dinner weighed themselves and saw that they had lost two pounds, it would be easy to continue to eat in that manner. Proper eating was not that difficult because the reinforcement was immediate. Unfortunately, weight loss does not occur quickly so it is quite challenging for most people. If delayed reinforcement stymies most adults, it certainly will be problematic for children. Expecting a child to have well on Tuesday, for example, for some reward that may occur next Saturday, is likely to be ineffective. The reinforcement must be administrated immediately.

2) For nearly one hundred years research has shown that the best way to change an undesirable behavior is to reinvigorate the alternative desired behavior.

Often when I speak in public, during the question and answer segment, I am asked a question which takes the form of: “My child does so and so, which I do not like; The question portends some form of punishment.

My response to that type of question is always, “What would you prefer the child to do instead?” When I get the answer to that question, I always respond with, “Then reinforcement that.”

For example, if the children are squabbling in the backseat of the car while you are driving, you could scream at them to be quiet or, instead, distract them and say, “Let’s play a game. wins. ” In this manner, the kids learn alternative ways to be responsibly for parental attention.

3) Ignore mild to moderately inappropriate behavior – using “extinction” – and allow “logical / natural consequences” to occur.

Mostappropriate behaviors that children exhibit is mildly to moderately inappropriate – like whining, procrastinating, forgetting, complaining, etc. This kind of negative behavior is done primarily for parental (negative) attention. Since most of the appropriate behavior children exhibit is for attention, then clearly the best response to that kind of behavior is no response. Behavioral psychologists refer to this as “extinction.” When I tell parents in my office to ignore these behaviors in their children, they often look at me like I’m crazy. However, if they follow through with this concept, parents are amazed at how powerful doing nothing is.

I have been recommending this “experiment” to parents for decades: “The next time your kids start to bicker, simply get up, leave the room, say nothing, go into your bedroom, leave the door open, and sit on your bed and wait. ” When I suggest this to parents, I often hear: “You’ve got to be kidding! There’ll be blood on the floor! Someone will be seriously injured!”

However, what, in fact, almost always occurs is within 30 seconds the kids are in the parent’s bedroom bringing the fight to mom or dad: “He’s mean!” “She’s not playing fair!” “He / she started it!” What this experiment clearly demonstrates that is, for the most part, siblings fight not because they want to maim each other but because they have learned arguing is an excellent attention getting mechanism.

When using extinction it is imperative that parents be consistent. Do not make the mistake of disregarding the initialappropriate behavior for a time but then later respond to it. It is predictable that when you initially ignore some behavior it will escalate. Be steadfast in your extinction. If you respond to escalated behavior, you will have taught your child to become more obnoxiously persistent. It will not take too long before the child understands the message of extinction and ceases their inappropriate behavior.

By using extinction – doing nothing – logical subsequences are allowed to come into play. For example, siblings who fight and argument are left to work it out amongst themselves. The child who chooses not to complete their homework (or project) is left to be confronted by the teacher (who has received an email or a phone call from the parent saying the child behaved irresponsibly and the teacher is empowered to apply any appropriate consequence) . The child who says he / she refuses to eat what is being served for dinner is simply and calmly told to leave the table. (The child is not asked, once again, “How do you know you do not like it until you’ve tried it,” or else yet, is made something else to eat.) The teen that gets a speeding ticket is not screamed at and grounded from driving for 60-90 days; instead, the teen is required to work off the $ 120.00 dollars by doing household chores to pay for the driver re-education class he will have to attend on Saturday.

The basic components of logical connotations are that the child does not receive negative attention (and “get their parent’s goat”) for misbehavior; the child learns through outside factors – not their parents’ wrath – that misbehavior has its own logical / natural concences; and, lastly, with no hysteria the child is not distracted from their misbehavior and is forced to confront their own guilt.

4) State the task once, clearly and specifically, and allow the child to respond. Depending on the child’s response, follow through with the appropriate conspiracy – reinforcement, extinction, or (rarely) punishment.

Parents cheapen themselves. Without exaggeration I have heard at least a hundred times some parent say: “I have to tell my child at least five times before he / she will do anything.” When I hear a parent say that I usually ask, “What do you think you’ve taught your child about your first request?”

Parent must state their request one time and allow the child to respond. Once the child has responded – good or bad – the parent applies the appropriate consequence. One of my favorite responses when one of my sons chose to ignore a task was to do that task at the same time that they wanted something or needed to go somewhere. It was a great natural / logical consequence.

The parent must expect that the child will make some irresponsible choices. Which child does not? It’s to be expected. It’s part of the learning process. Consequent that poor choice and move on. Behavioral management works when the child behaves positively and is reinforced and when the child misbehaves and is appropriately chosen.

5) It is not the child’s behavior but the parent’s response to the behavior that matters.

Most parents mistakenly believe they must control their children’s behavior and must make them behave. This is impossible and, moreover, puts much undo pressure on parents. An effective parent is one who systematically provides appropriate consequences to their child’s behavior.

Using these five rules parents enable their children to become independent, responsible adults.